USPTO serial 77737152
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by BURO HAPPOLD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C.
NEW YORK, NY
SHoP Construction Services LLC
New York, NY
SHoP Construction Services LLC
New York, NY
SHoP Construction Services LLC
New York, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deena R. Merlen
DEENA R. MERLEN REAVIS PARENT LEHRER LLP41 MADISON AVE FL 41NEW YORK, NY 10010-2202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consultation in the field of energy efficiency; Business consulting services in the field of building energy usage management and energy efficiency; Energy auditing; Business consultation regarding energy usage management; residential and commercial building energy assessment services for the purpose of determining energy efficiency or usage management; Information in the field of energy efficiency; Promoting the interests of people concerned with health, community and environmental sustainability issues; Consultation in the field of energy efficiency, namely, estimating building construction and energy costs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 13, 2012 |
| 036 | Financial advice in the field of energy efficiency preconstruction and construction services; Financial analysis and research services relating to energy efficient building construction and renovation; Financial consultation to assist in securing government incentives and private financing for increasing energy efficiency of buildings; Financial consultation in the field of building portfolio review; Financial consultation in the field of sustainable investment and implementation strategies for properties; Financial consultation in the field of real estate and economic revitalization; Financial consultation in the field of property development; Financial consultation in the nature of financial management of large-scale sustainable energy initiatives; Financial due diligence services in the field of real estate | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 13, 2012 |
| 037 | Building construction services; Building construction supervision; Building construction, remodeling and repair; Building inspection; Construction and renovation of buildings; Construction consultation; Construction management; Construction, maintenance and renovation of property; Consultation in building construction supervision; Consulting in the field of building construction; General construction contracting; Inspection services in the course of construction of energy-efficient buildings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 13, 2012 |
| 042 | Engineering consultation services in the field of building energy efficiency; Consulting in the field of structural engineering; Consulting in the fields of engineering and architecture for buildings; Drawing up of plans and engineering drawings for buildings and energy utilization; Engineering services, namely, engineering for the construction industry, namely, mechanical, electrical, plumbing and structural engineering for buildings; Engineering services for energy-efficiency improvements in buildings; Engineering services for buildings and the construction industry; Design for others in the field of engineering for buildings and energy utilization; Mechanical engineering; Providing a website featuring information about green engineering and green architecture, sustainable community planning and infrastructure development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 13, 2012 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |