USPTO serial 77737221
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
88046 FRIEDRICHSHAFEN, DE
88046 FRIEDRICHSHAFEN, DE
49448 Lemförde, DE
49448 Lemförde, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BREWSTER TAYLOR
BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC1800 DIAGONAL ROADSUITE325ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1445| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | VEHICLE PARTS, NAMELY, OPERATIONAL CONTROLLERS FOR ELECTRONIC OR AUTOMATIC SLIDING SHIFTING ACTUATION FOR SHIFTING VEHICLE TRANSMISSIONS, NAMELY, GEARSHIFTS; ELECTRONIC OPERATIONAL CONTROL SLIDING SHIFTING ACTUATOR FOR SHIFTING VEHICLE TRANSMISSIONS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC GEAR SHIFTS FOR AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS; SHIFTERS FOR VEHICLE TRANSMISSIONS FOR SLIDING SHIFTING ACTUATION WITH AN ELECTRONIC UNIT FOR SELECTING GEAR POSITIONS, NAMELY, GEAR SHIFTS AND PARTS SOLD AS A COMPONENT THEREFOR; MECHANICAL CONTROLLERS FOR VEHICLE TRANSMISSIONS, NAMELY, MECHANICAL GEAR SHIFTS FOR TRANSMISSIONS; MECHANICAL TRANSMISSION SHIFTING MEANS, NAMELY, MECHANICAL GEAR SHIFTS FOR LAND VEHICLES; AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION VEHICLE SHIFTERS FOR SLIDING SHIFTING ACTUATION WITH AN ELECTRONIC UNIT FOR SELECTING GEAR POSITIONS, NAMELY, GEAR CHANGING MECHANISMS FOR LAND VEHICLES; ELECTRONIC VEHICLE TRANSMISSION SHIFTERS FOR SLIDING SHIFTING ACTUATION FOR SELECTING TRANSMISSION POSITIONS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC GEAR SHIFTS FOR VEHICLE TRANSMISSIONS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |