USPTO serial 77737276
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5369UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body care products, namely, body creams, body lotions, body oils, skin moisturizing creams in the nature of muds; salt and oil body scrubs, shower gels, body lotion, mud shower gel, body butter, eye creams, hand creams, body creams, face creams, non-medicated foot creams, facial toner, skin moisturizers, anti-wrinkle creams, non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin peels for the face, mud cleansing bath gel, cosmetic day cream, peel-off beauty mask, mineral shampoo, shampoo, mud shampoo, mineral conditioner, conditioner, mud hair mask, non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, aroma body peel, aroma shower gel, aroma body oil, aroma body butter, aroma body lotion, soaps, bath salts, after shave balm, moisturizing cream, calming eye contour gel, moisturizer for styling hair, firming eye cream, non-medicated deep tissue skin serum, firming neck and decollete beauty gel, deep tissue exfoliants for skin, gentle peel skin mask, advanced facial cleanser, cleansing milk, anti-aging day treatment beauty cream, anti-aging night treatment beauty cream, foot revival, namely, foot scrubs and non-medicated foot cream; body wash, salt body scrub, argan body oil; cosmetics; hair products, namely, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair oils, hair lotion, and hair mousse | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |