Drawing for SKODA

USPTO serial 77737779

SKODA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKODA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Lim

KAREN LIM FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and electronic diagnostic systems consisting primarily of microprocessor based hardware and software used to monitor the reliability of a vehicle's operation and a vehicle's operation and maintenance costs; electric and electronic overvoltage and current protection guard systems consisting primarily of sensors, display units, signal processors, communication and memory modules, and circuit breakers used to protect electric devices from damage caused by power surges; information and control units for monitoring electricity consumption and promoting lower energy consumption; electrical and electronic self-test systems consisting primarily of sensors, display units, signal processors, memory and communication modules used to diagnose problems with vehicles for easier and quicker maintenance; electrical and electronic insulating guard systems consisting primarily of sensors, display units, signal processors, communication modules, and circuit breakers used to monitor the state of the insulation of electrically conductive parts of a vehicle; electrical and electronic anti-wheel skid and slide control systems consisting primarily of sensors, display units, signal processors, memory and communication modules used to prevent skidding and sliding of wheels in the event of sudden braking or braking on a slippery surface, all the preceding for public transport vehicles, namely, streetcars, trolleybuses, and buses; battery and battery chargers for land and subway vehicles excluding automobilesACTIVE—
012Public transport vehicles, namely, streetcars, buses, trolleybuses, subway passenger cars, railway passenger cars, locomotives, coaches for locomotive trains, electric railway cars, self-generating electric locomotives and structural parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 15, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 3, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 6, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 5, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 12, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 19, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance