Drawing for STANDING HOTEL

USPTO serial 77737867

STANDING HOTEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STANDING HOTEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce S. Londa

BRUCE S. LONDA NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 3RD AVE FL 18NEW YORK, NY 10022-6225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Database management software relating to the field of hotel business; software for accessing and connecting to mobile websites relating to the field of hotel businessACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, transmission and distribution of voice, data and images via telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information service networks and data networks; providing access to the Internet by broadband, optical or wireless networksACTIVE—
043Hotel service; providing food and drink; providing hotel, temporary accommodation and restaurant reservation services via electronic telecommunication and mobile Internet; travel agency services, namely, booking temporary accommodation for travellersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 19, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance