CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RECIPES ON-DEMAND

USPTO serial 77739014

RECIPES ON-DEMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3753456Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 23, 2010
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with RECIPES ON-DEMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Arnold Jr.

Patrick J. Arnold Jr. McAndrews, Held & Malloy Ltd500 W. Madison St., Suite 3400Chicago, IL 60661United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing consumer product information via the InternetACTIVEOct 5, 2009
043Providing a database in the field of recipes and cooking informationACTIVEOct 5, 2009
044Foods nutrition consultation; providing information about nutritionACTIVEOct 5, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2020NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2020RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 1, 202089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 1, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 20, 2020E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 6, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 23, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 29, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 26, 2016NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 20168.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Mar 25, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 8, 2016ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2015REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 3, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 3, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 27, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 22, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 18, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 29, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 21, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2010R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2010CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2010GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2010IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 19, 2010AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 19, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 12, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 11, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance