Drawing for HAZARD RECOGNITION DRIVING

USPTO serial 77739574

HAZARD RECOGNITION DRIVING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAZARD RECOGNITION DRIVING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry E. Kaplan

Barry E. Kaplan Woodcock Washburn LLP2929 Arch StreetCira Centre, 12th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19104-2891

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DVDs featuring safe driving instructional contentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 3, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 5, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance