USPTO serial 77740405
RENDERING CONFIDENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4107184Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 6, 2012
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RENDERING CONFIDENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Granby, Quebec, CA
Granby, Quebec, CA
Granby, Quebec, CA
GRANBY, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank Terranella
Frank Terranella ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE, 10TH FLOOR, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital data processing system comprised primarily of computer software and computer hardware for use in virtual imaging and multi-dimensional diagnostic imaging using graphical parameters; digital data processing system comprised primarily of computer software and computer hardware for use in transmitting data electronically via the internet and corporate intranets; digital data processing system comprised primarily of computer software and computer hardware for users to interact and exchange data electronically via the internet and corporate intranets in real-time; digital data processing system consisting primarily of computer software and computer hardware for use in capturing, storing, retrieving, reading, processing, manipulating and analyzing digital data | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Digital data processing system used as a patient aided diagnostic apparatus consisting primarily of computer software and computer hardware for use in capturing, storing, retrieving, reading, processing, manipulating and analyzing medical data for patients and generating computer aided diagnostic information for use in treating medical conditions and preparing images for surgery; digital data processing systems used as a patient aided diagnostic apparatus consisting primarily of computer software and computer hardware for use in performing virtual colonoscopies, virtual bronchoscopies, virtual neuronendoscopies, virtual endoscopies, virtual breast cancer imaging, and virtual imaging in the diagnoses of cancer | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Installation of computer software for use in virtual imaging and multi-dimensional diagnostic imaging using graphical parameters; installation of computer software for use in generating images for virtual colonoscopies, virtual bronchoscopies, virtual neuron-endoscopies, virtual endoscopies, virtual breast cancer, and virtual diagnoses of cancer | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DOG MICROSYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOG MICROSYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOG MICROSYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CADENS MEDICAL IMAGING INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RENDERING CONFIDENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2019 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 1, 2019 | NCS7 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 15, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |