Drawing for DISNEY G G-FORCE

USPTO serial 77740610

DISNEY G G-FORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISNEY G G-FORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin Daley

KEVIN DALEY THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 SOUTH BUENA VISTA STREETCORPORATE LEGAL - TRADEMARK DEPARTMENTBURBANK, CA 91521-0854

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Beachwear; belts; bottoms; chaps; cloth bibs; coats; costumes for use in role-playing games; cover-ups; dresses; ear muffs; footwear; gloves; Halloween costumes; headwear; hosiery; infant wear; jackets; leotards; lingerie; loungewear; mittens; overalls; pants; ponchos; rainwear; scarves; shirts; shorts; skirts; sleepwear; socks; sweaters; sweatshirts; swimwear; ties; tops; underwear; wristbandsACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Jul 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Jun 14, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
May 28, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
May 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
May 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
May 11, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jan 25, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jan 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jan 21, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 14, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTEREDโ€”
Sep 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Sep 10, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
May 23, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILEDโ€”
May 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
May 22, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance