USPTO serial 77741252
NEXTERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEXTERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE RECHER
BRUCE RECHER HENSON & EFRON, P.A.220 S 6TH ST STE 1800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Fixed and mobile telephone services; International telephone services; Interstate telephone services; Intrastate telephone services; Local and long distance telephone services; Long distance telephone communication services; Mobile telephone services; Telecommunication services in the nature of providing telephone features, namely, call waiting, call identification, call forwarding, and message waiting; Telecommunication services in the nature of providing telephone services with various telephone features, namely, a dedicated toll-free number, voicemail, multiple mailbox extensions, telephone message notification, fax capabilities, detailed call reports, call waiting, call identification, call forwarding, and message waiting; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics and video by means of broadband optical or wireless networks; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics and video by means of broadband, copper and optical or wireless networks; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; Telecommunication services, namely, providing internet access via broadband optical or wireless networks; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, sound and video by means of broadband power line or wireless networks; Telecommunication services, namely, wireless telephone services; Telephone communication services; Telephone voice messaging services; Wireless broadband communication services | ACTIVE | May 5, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |