USPTO serial 77741503
MUELLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUELLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Keller
PAUL A. KELLER HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200TROY, MI 48098-2683UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal pipe, conduits, and tube; metal pipe, conduit, and tube fittings; steel pipe; copper pipe and tube; plastic coated copper tube; steel, copper, and bronze pipe fittings and tube fittings; straps for hanging pipes and tubes; copper tube straps; copper tubing sold with rubber plugs therein; metal pipe with threads; copper and brass fittings and forgings; metal rods for further manufacture; metal moldings formed by mechanical pressure with and without heat; forgeable bronze bearing alloys; forgings, cold metal extrusions, impacts and castings; forgings of metal; plumbing adaptors, namely couplings and joints, made of metal, for pipes; pre-soldered copper fittings, namely, copper elbows, tees, couplings, adapters, and caps for connecting to copper pipe and tubing in plumbing and refrigeration applications; steel pipe nipples, brass pipe nipples, metal merchant pipe couplings, malleable metal pipe fittings; metal plumbing, steam and gas valves; metal fluid activated ball valves; manually operated metal valves and manually operated metal valve handles | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | refrigeration and air conditioning equipment, namely, filters, strainers, dryers, copper, brass and bronze fittings and forgings, valves and replacement parts therefore, apparatus for removing water and other foreign materials from refrigerant fluids, diaphragm shut-off valves, relief valves; refrigerant liquid level indicators; plumbing fixtures, namely, drains, shower heads, faucets, kitchen faucets, strainers, compression repair couplings, flanges, stops, valve handles, spouts, unions, clamps, plugs, nozzles, glands, humidifier kits for ice making equipment, disposal connectors, bathtub trip levers, flexible connectors; plumbing valves, namely, ball valves, globe valves, gate valves, gas cocks, washing machine valves, drain valves, boiler drain valves, hose bibs, sill cocks, frost free sill cocks, garden valves, evaporative cooler valves, stop valves, stop and water valves, manually operated valves, and valve parts; metal locking device for hose bibs, faucets and plumbing valves | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |