Drawing for BRIGHTTALK

USPTO serial 77741801

BRIGHTTALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BRIGHTTALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Furr

JEFFREY M. FURR FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT ROADUTICA, OH 43080-9604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer software communication protocol service built on top of the UDP-IP, namely, providing non-downloadable computer software for enabling peer-to-peer communication between network nodes over IP with purpose to establish communication and to transmit by electronic means any kind of data including web pages, messages, sounds, images between networked computersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 25, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 25, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 8, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 7, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance