Drawing for LUBRACETYLFLEX

USPTO serial 77741882

LUBRACETYLFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUBRACETYLFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kourtney Mulcahy

KOURTNEY MULCAHY HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP222 N LASALLE ST STE 300CHICAGO, IL 60601-1081UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005nutritional health supplements for animalsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance