Drawing for PERIPHERNET

USPTO serial 77741929

PERIPHERNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERIPHERNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisa P. Rosen

ELISA P. ROSEN DOW LOHNES PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-6805UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use in communicating between multiple consumer electronic devices; digital electronics products, communications devices, and digital networking equipment, namely, televisions, digital picture frames, mobile phones and digital enhanced cordless telecommunications phones, digital video players and digital video recorders, game consoles, set top boxes, personal computers (PCs), handheld computing devices, all for use by consumers in a home environmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 26, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance