USPTO serial 77742368
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Analysts International Corporation
Minneapolis, MN
Other trademarks owned by Analysts International Corporation
Analysts International Corporation
Minneapolis, MN
Other trademarks owned by Analysts International Corporation
Analysts International Corporation
Minneapolis, MN
Other trademarks owned by Analysts International Corporation
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel E. Sineway
Daniel E. Sineway Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP3343 Peachtree Rd, N.E.1600 Atlanta Financial CenterAtlanta, GA 30326| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Outsourcing in the fields of information technology, communications technology, and business processes; Consulting services in the fields of procurement and sourcing in the field of the acquisition of computer software for others; Business continuity planning; Personnel placement and recruitment services in the field of temporary contract labor; Personnel management in the field of temporary contract labor; and Consulting services in the field of customer relationship management; Technical business consulting services in the field of enterprise resource planning integration; Technical business consulting services in the field of enterprise resource planning integration | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Information technology consulting in the field of data storage and retrieval; integration of computer systems and networks; Computer software design for others; providing engineering services in the field of information and communications networks; Computer project management services; Technical consulting services in the field of enterprise resource planning integration and informational technology security; Technical consulting services in the field of informational technology security | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |