Drawing for MYWRIGLEYVILLE

USPTO serial 77742522

MYWRIGLEYVILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MYWRIGLEYVILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael G. Kelber

MICHAEL G KELBER NEAL GERBER EISENBERG LLPTWO N LASALLE STREETSUITE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60602-4000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of local, neighborhood, brick-and-mortar businesses including bars, restaurants and other businesses, by listing their goods and services on an Internet website; retail store services featuring general consumer merchandise, photos and discounted consumer goods from merchants throughout Chicago and national vendors; providing hotel rate comparison informationABANDONED—
041Providing interactive information on sporting events, concerts, museums, entertainment or cultural exhibitions, festivals to tourists and visitors to the North Side of Chicago Illinois, via the Internet; arranging for ticket reservations for theatrical performances, sporting events, musical concerts and other entertainment events; providing information relating to theatrical performances, sporting events, musical concerts and other entertainment events via the Internet; booking of reservations for entertainment, sporting and cultural events; online theatrical ticket agency services; ticket agency services for sporting events, musical concerts and other entertainment events; providing information relating to entertainment event tickets via the InternetABANDONED—
045Providing a social networking website for entertainment purposes where visitors share photos, videos and opinionsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 9, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 9, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 9, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 1, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 28, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance