Drawing for PIRATES LIVE

USPTO serial 77742692

PIRATES LIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIRATES LIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan D. Berney-Key

SUSAN D BERNEY-KEY COOLEY LLP176 N MILTON AVENUECAMPBELL, CA 95008UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer gaming application software for mobile phones; computer application software for mobile phones; computer application software for social networking websites; game software; all the foregoing relating to pirates and a pirate theme and not relating to sports or to a sports team or mascotACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 1, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 31, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 29, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2012TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 20, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2012OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 11, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance