USPTO serial 77743133
INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS IN-FUSED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS IN-FUSED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf
SHERRI L. ROHLF SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER,100 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTHSUITE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2151Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body and massage oils; Hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, hair spray and sculpting gels, hair color, and hair waving lotions; skin care products, namely, moisturizers, toners, skin cleaning creams, skin and body lotions and bath gels, body and facial lotions, skin and body masks and astringents for cosmetic purposes; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, eye shadow, foundation, blush, face powder, concealer, eye pencils, lip pencils and mascara; personal hygiene products, namely, fragrances, essential oils for personal use, skin creams, skin lotions, skin emollients, moisturizing body oils and body lotions, perfumes and colognes; and household cleaning products, namely, all purpose cleansers, cleaners for use on dishes, cleaners for use on fabric, and cleansers for use on floors, walls, and windows, toilet bowl detergents | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; disinfectant toilet bowl cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food products, namely, candy; snack bars, namely, snack bars comprised of grains, vitamins and minerals, fruits and nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Essences for use in making soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorships, catalog ordering, on-line ordering, on-line retail stores, distributorships, mail order and retail store services featuring dietary and nutritional supplements, snack bars, food for human consumption, personal gifts, beverages, personal and home hygiene products and books, video and audio cassettes on nutrition, health and wellbeing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS IN-FUSED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |