Drawing for CRAIG TECHNOLOGIES C

USPTO serial 77743283

CRAIG TECHNOLOGIES C

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3809347Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 29, 2010
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CRAIG TECHNOLOGIES C?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark R. Malek

MARK R. MALEK WIDERMAN MALEK, PL1990 W. New Haven Ave.Ste. 201MELBOURNE, FL 32904

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business and management support services, namely, providing high level business management services, business analysis services, namely, business advice and analysis of markets, and business process support services, namely, providing business support staff servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2000
041Instructional training services in the field of engineering plant operation using modeling and simulationsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2000
042Engineering services in the field of systems, software, mechanical, electrical, network and information assurance; data analysis support services, namely, technical support, namely, providing back-up computer programs and facilities; information technology services, namely, information technology consulting services; and computer modeling services for others, namely, computer simulation to develop tools for trainingSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 29, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2016NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 27, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2015E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 29, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 26, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance