USPTO serial 77743401
PALM RESTAURANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2014
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PALM RESTAURANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HOUSTON, TX, US
Just One More Restaurant Corporation
Houston, TX, US
Other trademarks owned by Just One More Restaurant Corporation
Just One More Restaurant Corporation
New York, NY, US
Other trademarks owned by Just One More Restaurant Corporation
Just One More Restaurant Corporation
New York, NY, US
Other trademarks owned by Just One More Restaurant Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason Paul Blair
Jason Paul Blair DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1301 K Street N.W.Suite 1100 WestWashington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Paper towel holders; kitchenware, namely, bread boxes; household containers for foods; non-electric household or kitchen containers not made of precious metals; portable coolers; portable beverage coolers and beverage dispensers; portable ice chests for food and beverages; thermal insulated containers and tote bags for food and beverages; whisks, pie servers, non-electric juicers, juice reamers, knife blocks, colanders for household use, flour sifters, cooking sifters, potato mashers, melon ballers, corn on the cob holders and skewers, ice cream scoopers, skimmers, vegetable brushes, mixing bowls, trivets, garlic presses, and brushes for basting meat; salt and pepper shakers; dinnerware, namely, glass, earthenware, porcelain and plastic dishes, plates, bowls, serving platters, teapots not of precious metal, and china dinnerware; glass, earthenware, porcelain and plastic beverageware, namely, mugs, cups, tumblers, goblets, carafes, decanters, pitchers, beverage stirrers, beer jugs, drinking steins and glasses, flasks; coasters not of paper or linen, bottles sold empty and glass storage jars sold empty, insulating jars, cookie jars and glass jars for jams; serveware and household utensils, namely, serving spoons, serving forks, slotted spoons, mixing spoons, graters, spatulas, basting spoons and ladles; barware, namely, cocktail shakers, corkscrews, bottle openers, cork holders, coolers or cooling buckets for wine or beverage cooling, bottle stands; plastic buckets and ice buckets; bakeware; baking dishes; beer mugs; beverage glassware; beverageware; bottle openers; bowls; bread boards, boxes and cases; brushes for basting meat; butter coolers, dishes and pans; butter-dish and cheese-dish covers; cake brushes, molds, pans, rests, rings, servers, stands and tins; canister sets; carving boards; casseroles; cheese graters; chopping boards for kitchen use; lemon squeezers; coffee cups, measures, pots not of precious metal, services not of precious metal and stirrers; colanders; confectioners' decorating bags; cookie cutters, jars and sheets; cooking pots and pans, sieves and sifters, skewers, steamers and strainers; cookware, namely, pots and pans, roasting pans and steamers; coolers for wine; cups; cutting boards; decorating bags for confectioners; dinnerware, namely, plates, cups and saucers; dishes and plates; dispensers for liquid soap and for paper towels; drinking cups and glasses; dutch ovens; earthenware mugs; egg cups, poachers and separators; frying pans; glass beverageware, bowls, carafes, dishes, mugs, pans and storage jars; goblets; gravy boats; household containers for foods; household utensils, namely, graters, sieves, spatulas and turners; ice cream scoops; kitchen ladles and urns; knife blocks, boards and rests; meal trays; mixing cups and spoons; muffin tins; mugs; napkin holders not of precious metal; non-electric egg beaters, griddles, juicers, kettles, kitchen containers not of precious metal, pressure cookers and pressure cooking saucepans; oven to table racks; ovenware; pastry boards, cutters and molds; pie pans and servers; plates; pots; roasting dishes; rolling pins; salad bowls and spinners; sauceboats not of precious metal; saucepans; saucers; scrapers for household use; serving bowls, dishes, forks, ladles, spoons and tongs; serving platters and trays not of precious metal; soup tureens; stemware; trays not of precious metal; utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs and turners; whisks; woks; general purpose storage bins for household use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2009 |
| 029 | Gourmet foods, namely, olive oil, processed olives, edible oils, extra-virgin olive oil, dipping oils, infused vegetable oils, cocktail onions, processed cherries; processed nuts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2009 |
| 030 | Gourmet foods, namely, balsamic vinegar; whole bean and ground coffee | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2009 |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic cocktail mixes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LNY PLM, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Just One More Restaurant Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Just One More Restaurant Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Just One More Restaurant Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PALM RESTAURANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |