Drawing for MALIBU ROUGE

USPTO serial 77745358

MALIBU ROUGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3779728Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 20, 2010
Examiner
IMAM, AMEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MALIBU ROUGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILIP NULUD

PHILIP NULUD BUCHALTER NEMER1000 WILSHIRE BLVD.SUITE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Oct 29, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Oct 29, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 20, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2010R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2010CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance