Drawing for YELLOW EMERALD

USPTO serial 77745553

YELLOW EMERALD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YELLOW EMERALD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly B. Markley

MOLLY B MARKLEY YOUNG BASILE HANLON & MACFARLANE PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RDSUITE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Golden beryl gemstonesACTIVEAug 11, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 28, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 24, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jan 27, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 22, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 21, 2010RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Sep 21, 2010RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2010RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Sep 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2010AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 29, 2010AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 29, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 14, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance