USPTO serial 77745636
E NEXTERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E NEXTERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce Recher
Bruce Recher HENSON & EFRON, P.A.220 S 6TH ST STE 1800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication by electronic computer terminals; Communication by mobile telephone; Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; Communication via analogue and digital computer terminals; Communication via computer terminals, by digital transmission or by satellite; Communication via fibre optical networks; Communication via fibre-optic networks; Communication via optical fibre networks; Communication via radio, telegraph, telephone and television transmissions; Communications by computer terminals; Communications by means of mobile phones; Communications by mobile phones; Communications by telephone; Communications via analogue and digital computer terminals; Communications via fiber-optic networks; Communications via fibre-optic networks; Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Long distance telephone communication services; Mobile telephone communication; Providing co-location services for voice, video and data communications applications; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the web site user to other local and global web pages; Providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; Providing voice communication services via the Internet; Radio, telephone, telegraph communication services; Rental of teleprocessing and computer communication apparatus and instruments; Signal transmission for electronic commerce via telecommunication systems and data communication systems; Telecommunication consultation in the nature of technical consulting in the field of audio, text and visual data transmission and communication; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; Telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services; Telephone communication services; Telephone communications; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Wireless broadband communication services; Wireless communications services, namely, transmission of graphics to mobile telephones | ACTIVE | May 5, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |