Drawing for INNOVATION FIRST INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 77747746

INNOVATION FIRST INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4292600Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 19, 2013
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with INNOVATION FIRST INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Bischoff

Christopher J. Bischoff Bischoff & Associates, Ltd.1650 Payne StreetEvanston, IL 60201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, arranging live and online seminars, workshops and classes, all in the field of robotics and electronics; entertainment services, namely, organizing exhibitions, competitions and conducting contests and games in the field of robotsACTIVEMar 2, 2009
042technical consultation in the field of robotics design and engineering; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for othersACTIVEMar 2, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2023NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2023RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 8, 202389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 8, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2023E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2022NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Feb 23, 2022NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Feb 19, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2019NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2019C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 23, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2018E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2018REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 15, 2013SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2012CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 19, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 17, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 15, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 18, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 6, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 17, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 8, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 7, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Jan 24, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 21, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 15, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 1, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance