USPTO serial 77751802
CAREGIV(H)ER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAREGIV(H)ER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alicia Morris Groos
Alicia Morris Groos Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1100Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; cosmetics, namely, self-tanning lotions, creams, gels, and sprays, liquid makeup foundations, cream makeup foundations, facial highlighters, blemish concealers, mascaras, eyeliners, eye pencils, eye shadows, eyebrow pencils, eye makeup removers, blushers, rouges, powder and cream cheek colors, loose and pressed face powders, lipsticks, lip glosses, lip liner pencils, lip color crayons, lipstick adjusters, namely, preparations used to adjust the shade of lip color, nail care preparations, nail colors, nail top and base coats; Perfumes; colognes; related bath and shower gels, body soaps, essential oils for personal use, bath oils and body oils; bath salts; bubble bath; body lotions, creams, gels and powders; body sprays and mists, and fragranced wash for fine lingerie; skin care products, namely, cleansing creams and lotions, fresheners, toners, moisturizers, night creams, cleansing bars and facial soaps, hand creams, body creams, face creams, skin conditioners, facial oil controllers, skin oil absorbers, masks, cosmetic facial muds, buffing creams, facial and body scrubs; skin exfoliators, skin emollients, liquid talcs, and body polishers; non-medicated sunscreen and sun block preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dietary supplements; nutritional supplements; meal replacement shakes; vitamins; mineral supplements; medicinal herbs; dietary supplement smoothie; Powdered nutritional supplement drink mix | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, tapioca, sago, flour; ready to eat cereal derived food bars; cereal-based snack foods; bread, pastries and frozen confections; ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; chilled packaged combinations consisting primarily of pasta or rice; breakfast cereal, bread, muffins, snack cakes, ice cream, frozen confections, candy, pudding, cookies, crackers; bagels; bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; bread and buns; rolls; pretzels; oatmeal; Frozen desserts consisting of milk based or milk substitute based desserts, cakes, pies and mousses; spaghetti sauce; natural sweetener, flavored shake mix; popped popcorn and puffed grains; pizza; potato or corn based chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ruth Glendinning
- Other trademarks owned by Ruth Glendinning
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CAREGIV(H)ER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |