USPTO serial 77751862
THE STICK MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE STICK MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Belleville, WI
Belleville, WI
Belleville, WI
Belleville, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik W. Ibele
Erik W. Ibele Neider & Boucher, S.C.401 Charmany Drive, Suite 310Madison, WI 53719UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Providing meat snacks to spectators and participants at athletic events, concerts, fairs, festivals, rallies and other special events by means of individuals acting as mobile vendors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Scott Hare
- Other trademarks owned by Scott Hare
- Other trademarks owned by Lisa Hare
- Other trademarks owned by Lisa Hare
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named THE STICK MAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 20, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |