Drawing for CONTACT INFO LINKS POWERED BY BUSINESSCARD2 MORE INFO

USPTO serial 77755543

CONTACT INFO LINKS POWERED BY BUSINESSCARD2 MORE INFO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTACT INFO LINKS POWERED BY BUSINESSCARD2 MORE INFO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carrie L. Olson

CARRIE L ROSENBERRY FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH STSUITE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing online, non-downloadable software for the marketing of individuals and businesses through electronic meansACTIVEAug 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 12, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 20, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2011CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
May 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 11, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 11, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 10, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 10, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2010CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 26, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 26, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 12, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance