USPTO serial 77757604
INSTA-PINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTA-PINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlestown, Nevis, KN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael O. Sturm
MICHAEL O. STURM STURM & FIX LLP206 6TH AVE STE 1213DES MOINES, IA 50309-4015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Pre-stained tongue and groove interior finishing panels, namely, non-metal wall and ceiling panels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 3, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |