Drawing for ALLSTAR

USPTO serial 77757875

ALLSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALLSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Kegan

DANIEL KEGAN KEGAN & KEGAN, LTD79 W MONROE ST STE 1320CHICAGO, IL 60603-4969UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bakery goods; CookiesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Mar 25, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Mar 24, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 30, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 12, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 17, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jun 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 15, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance