USPTO serial 77757921
COLORESCIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2012
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with COLORESCIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dana Point, CA, US
Carlsbad, CA, US
Carlsbad, CA, US
Carlsbad, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Salima A. Merani, Ph.D.
Salima A. Merani, Ph.D. Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | concealers; Skin lotions | ACTIVE | Mar 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Colorescience
- Other trademarks owned by Colorescience
- Other trademarks owned by Colorescience, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Colorescience
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named COLORESCIENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 24, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 23, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 21, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 29, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |