USPTO serial 77758863
PROBIOTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROBIOTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vacaville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandy Lipkin,
SANDRA LEE LIPKIN LAW OFFICES OF SANDY LIPKINPO BOX 3518VENTURA, CA 93006-3518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Ammonium chloride fertilizer; Ammonium nitrate fertilizer; Ammonium sulphate fertilizer; Blood powder; Bone meal; Brewers' grain; Calcined potassium fertilizer; Calcium silicate fertilizer; Calcium superphosphate fertilizer; Chemical fertilizers; Chemically converted compound fertilizers; Compost; Double or triple superphosphate fertilizer; Fertilizers; Fertilizers and manures; Fertilizers for agricultural use; Fertilizers for domestic use; Fertilizing preparations; Leaf mold; Manganese fertilizer; Marine fertilizer; Mixed fertilizers; Natural fertilizers; Non-chemical bio-fertilizers; Omplex fertilizers; Peat; Potassium chloride fertilizer; Potassium sulphate fertilizer; Rice bran; Sodium nitrate fertilizer; Thomas phosphatic fertilizer; Urea fertilizer | ACTIVE | Jul 12, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |