USPTO serial 77759558
SEEING IS KNOWING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEEING IS KNOWING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2260 AD LEIDSCHENDAM, NL
2260 AD LEIDSCHENDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418
JERALD E. NAGAE, REG. NO. 29,418 CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLLC1420 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Alarms, namely personal security alarms, anti-intrusion alarms, fire alarms, smoke alarms, residential burglar alarms, office burglar alarms, multistory car park alarms, alarms for perimeter protection, and alarms for traffic surveillance integrated circuit cards, blank smart cards; integrated circuits; camera cases; camera filters; camera tripods; cellular telephones; electronic combined motion and presence detectors; communication servers; computer software to allow customers to access cameras with an integrated computer processor; computer hardware, namely central processing units, data processing apparatus, micro processors, data readers, data scanners, bar code readers; computer monitors; computer operating programs; computer operating systems; computer peripherals; computer programs and software for operating cameras with an integrated processors; computer programs and software used for computer operating systems and anti-theft monitoring; computer programs and software for surveillance of facilities to control intrusion; computer programs and software for surveying of oil beds and fields; computers; detectors for presence detection and processing and decision making; active infrared motion and presence detectors; passive infrared motion and presence detectors; radar motion and presence detectors; camera motion and presence detectors; ultrasound motion and presence detectors; infrared laser motion and presence detectors; temperature sensors; 2d camera detectors for motion presence detection and processing and decision making; 3d camera detectors for motion and presence detection and processing and decision making; detectors for motion detection and processing and decision making; detectors for use in the nursing industry; digital cameras; digital video recorders; electronic door openers; electronic motion sensitive switches; blinking emergency warning lights; video system comprising video cameras for recording of moving images, and data storage units for storage of event data in the form of moving images or event data which originates from said images, and monitors to allow for inspection of the event data; graphical user interface software; image-processing software; intelligent image processing applications software; intelligent intrusion sensors; local area network (LAN) hardware and software; magnifying glasses; magnifying peepholes for doors; motion picture cameras; movie projectors; optical character recognition apparatus; optical scanners; parking meters; photographic projectors; remote control apparatus for cameras with an integrated processor; scanners and data processors; smart camera platforms comprising optics, image sensors, ASIC-processors and communication units sold as a unit; smart cameras with built-in facial recognition processors for access control, and for arming and de-arming alarm systems, and for identity verification of individual, and for document identify verification; smoke detectors; surveillance cameras; video cameras; video monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of security systems, personal security alarms, anti-intrusion alarms, fire alarms, smoke alarms, residential and office burglar alarms, theft prevention devices, alarms for perimeter protection, alarms for traffic surveillance, and anti-theft alarms for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming; consultancy in the field of computer software; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; computer software design and development; computer systems design and development; computer systems analysis; engineering; product research and development consultation for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Secumanagement B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Secumanagement B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SEEING IS KNOWING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |