Drawing for SIDESTIX

USPTO serial 77759812

SIDESTIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIDESTIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert N. Cook

ROBERT N. COOK WHITHAM, CURTIS, CHRISTOFFERSON & COOK11491 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 340RESTON, VA 20190-5244UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Canes and structural parts therefor; cane accessories, namely, tips and handles; walking and hiking sticks and structural parts and accessories therefor; athletic bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 21, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2016IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Nov 7, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 7, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 4, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 6, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 5, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 5, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 16, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 15, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 11, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 23, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 25, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance