Drawing for BABY PURE

USPTO serial 77760544

BABY PURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY PURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ernest I. Gifford

ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD KRASS SPRINKLE ANDERSON ET AL2701 TROY CENTER DRSTE 330TROY, MI 48084-4741

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Baby bottles, pacifiers, and teething ringsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 23, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 24, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 24, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 23, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 23, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance