USPTO serial 77760975
SONTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SONTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colin P. Abrahams
COLIN P. ABRAHAMS LAW OFFICE OF COLIN P. ABRAHAMS5850 CANOGA AVE STE 400WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-6554UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus; laptop computers; bar code readers; computer peripheral devices; computer software; readers, namely, REID readers, readers for magnetically encoded identification and service cards, magnetic card readers, smart card readers, banking card readers; electronic tags for goods; mobile phones; walkie-talkies; printed circuits; radio frequency identification (REID) tags; radio frequency identification tag readers; radio frequency identification antennas; radio frequency identification controllers; smart tags, namely, transponders; electronic apparatus for reading electronic tags; radio frequency identification (REID) credentials, namely, cards and tags, and readers for radio frequency identification credentials; encoded micro tags of plastic or metal for use in the field of passive labeling, tracing or tracking of persons, animals, vehicles or goods of any kind; computer software, computer programs and computer hardware for supply chain logistics management, and for personnel, asset and inventory management for field service operatives, field sales operatives and other mobile operatives, and for fleet management, asset management, asset tracking and vehicle tracking; magnetically encoded identification and service cards; integrated circuits; apparatus for recording or transmission of sound or images | ACTIVE | Sep 10, 2008 |
| 042 | Research, design, development, maintenance and updating of operating software for radio frequency identification systems; scientific research and development; industrial analysis and research services, namely, mechanical research and product research; design and development of computer hardware and software; engineering services; research, design, development and testing of new products for others; product and material testing services; quality control services; design, development, testing, research and quality assurance services in the field of wireless transfer of information and to telecommunications | ACTIVE | Sep 10, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |