Drawing for THE AWARENESS INITIATIVE

USPTO serial 77762193

THE AWARENESS INITIATIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE AWARENESS INITIATIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle D. Kahn

MICHELLE D KAHN SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 17SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4158UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public and professional interest in and awareness of the prevalence of prostate cancer; promoting public awareness of the need for prevention, early detection and treatment of prostate cancerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 28, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 10, 2010RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 3, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 3, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 3, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance