USPTO serial 77763462
DECONGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DECONGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George E. Darby
GEORGE E. DARBY DARBY LAW CORPORATIONPO BOX 893010MILILANI, HI 96789-0010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Removal of radioactive waste from surfaces; Removal of biological, chemical, radiological, radioactive, and nuclear waste from textiles and clothing; Applying protective coatings to surfaces to protect against graffiti, staining, and other superficial alterations | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Chemical encapsulation and dispersion of hazardous chemicals; Chemical treatment of textile; Bio-hazard biological decontamination services; Decontamination of nuclear waste; Medical waste, blood and bodily fluid decontamination services; Decontamination of hazardous materials; Consultation in the field of clandestine drug lab site decontamination; Decontamination of illegal clandestine drug lab sites | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Chemical, biochemical, biological and bacteriological research and analysis; Research services in the field of forensic science, namely, analysis, detection and isolation of biological substances in forensic samples; Consulting services in the fields of forensic science; Consulting services in the field of collection of evidence for forensic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellular Bioengineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellular Bioengineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DECONGEL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 25, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PDMS | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |