USPTO serial 77763906
NEDLAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEDLAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Breslau, Ontario, CA
Breslau, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Sinnott
Timothy J. Sinnott BERESKIN & PARR LLP/SENCRL, srl40 King Street West40th FloorToronto, Ontario, M5H3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on Intent to Use) Growing media for plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | (Based on Intent to Use) Air cleaning units and air purifying apparatuses, namely, living biological systems that clean and purify indoor air with the use of live plants; air purifying apparatuses comprising vegetated wall systems, namely, flowering and non flowering plants that grow without soil in a hydroponic wall that air flows through or is drawn through mechanically; automatic watering installations for plants to humidify the air and water the plants; vegetated rooftop systems for insulating roofs and acting as a thermomass to absorb storm water | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Roofing, installation, insulation, restoration and repair services; roofing contracting services; application of waterproof coatings to roofs; advisory services relating to the construction of civil engineering structures; construction of walls for buildings; construction of interior accommodation for buildings; providing maintenance of vegetated wall and roofing systems; providing consulting services with respect to the installation and maintenance of vegetated wall and roof systems | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2009 |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Design services for building exteriors and interiors for all residential and commercial buildings; Design services relating to roof covering components; Design services relating to vegetated wall systems in the nature of flowering and non flowering plants that grow without soil in a hydroponic wall that air flows through or is drawn through mechanically; architectural design services; engineering services relating to architecture; industrial engineering design services; providing programs for design of vegetated wall systems; providing consulting services with respect to the design of vegetated wall and roof systems; engineering services for the construction industry | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nedlaw Roofing Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Nedlaw Roofing Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NEDLAW
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |