USPTO serial 77765318
MUMBAI MANTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUMBAI MANTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Moxon II
GEORGE W. MOXON II MOXON & ASSOCIATES LLCSUITES L9L11 & L12110 WEST STREETSBOROHUDSON, OH 44236Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software encoded on magnetic media and on CD-ROMs for the operation and management of communication exchanges and to allow for transmission of voice, equipment, audio and video cassettes, tapes and records, radio and television channels, recording and storage media; video films, featuring traditional genre films, namely, action films, adventure films, comedy films, crime and gangster films, drama films, epic and historical films, horror films, musical and dance films, science fiction films, war films, and western films; cinematographic films, featuring traditional genre films, including action films, adventure films, comedy films, crime and gangster films, drama films, epic and historical films, horror films, musical and dance films, science fiction films, war films, and western films; computer hardware and software in the field of entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Provision of entertainment services, namely, distribution of video and cinema films, and audio visual entertainment, namely, dramas, plays, musicals, concerts, and programs having traditional film genres, training services in the field of film making; production of video discs, laser discs, audio discs, CD-ROMs for others; production and direction of movies and films and television programs and videos for others; information and advisory services relating to any of the aforesaid services; production, exhibition, distribution leasing or lending of films; provision of facilities for production of films | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |