USPTO serial 77766066
THE LOST ART OF THE GENTLEMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE LOST ART OF THE GENTLEMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl E. Gustafson
KARL E. GUSTAFSON LANG MICHENER LLP1055 WEST GEORGIA STREET, PO BOX 111171500 ROYAL CENTREVANCOUVER, BC, V6E4N7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | A series of books about male-female relationships | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |