USPTO serial 77766078
THE THINKING TUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE THINKING TUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sudbury, CA
Sudbury, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brant Latham
BRANT LATHAM; RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLP2 BLOOR STREET EAST, SUITE 1800Toronto, Ontario, M4W3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | hot tubs; spas in the nature of heated pools; water purification units for monitoring, dispensing and control of sanitizing chemicals in swimming pools, spas and hot tubs; water purification systems comprised of liquid storage vessels, liquid pumps, chemical sensors, liquid level sensors, timers, alarms, and electronic controllers for monitoring, dispensing and control of sanitizing chemicals in swimming pools, spas and hot tubs; water purification units for monitoring and control of water and chemicals in swimming pools, spas and hot tubs; water purification systems comprised of liquid storage vessels, liquid pumps, chemical sensors, liquid level sensors, timers, alarms, and electronic controllers for monitoring and control of water and chemicals in swimming pools, spas and hot tubs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 27, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |