USPTO serial 77766191
EDEN FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDEN FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
State Center, IA
State Center, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Brian Pingel
G BRIAN PINGEL BROWNWINICK LAW FIRM666 GRAND AVENUESUITE 2000DES MOINES, IA 50309-2510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meats, namely, pork | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |