Drawing for SERVICEWEAR APPAREL

USPTO serial 77767276

SERVICEWEAR APPAREL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERVICEWEAR APPAREL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Stark

STEPHEN J. STARK MILLER & MARTIN PLLC832 GEORGIA AVENUESUITE 1000CHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Bottoms; Jackets; Tops; Underwear; UniformsACTIVEDec 10, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 8, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 8, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 25, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 26, 2010RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 1, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 11, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 11, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 2, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 18, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 18, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2010IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 12, 2009AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 12, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 11, 2009EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance