Drawing for ACTIVLASH

USPTO serial 77767314

ACTIVLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIVLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas I. Rozsa

THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA LAW GROUP LC18757 BURBANK BLVD STE 220TARZANA, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003EYELASH CONDITIONERACTIVEApr 30, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 16, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 16, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 30, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 8, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 3, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 3, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 4, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 22, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance