Drawing for Serial No. 77768171

USPTO serial 77768171

Serial No. 77768171

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 77768171?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Day

Christopher J. Day Law Office of Christopher Day9977 North 90th Street, Suite 155Scottsdale, AZ 85258UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Bean curd products, namely, processed bean curd, fresh bean curd, deep fried been curd; prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables, namely, bean curd with duck, chicken, goose or ham flavoringsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 20, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance