USPTO serial 77768414
Serial No. 77768414
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 77768414?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DeAnne H. Ozaki
DEANNE H. OZAKI UMG RECORDINGS, INC.2220 COLORADO AVESANTA MONICA, CA 90404-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production of television and radio programs; distribution of television and radio programs for others; production and publishing of music; providing online entertainment, namely, providing non-downloadable sound and video recordings in the field of music and music-related entertainment; entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable prerecorded musical sound recordings and musical video recordings via a global computer network; fan clubs; development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of music and music-related entertainment; radio entertainment production and distribution, namely, production and distribution of radio programs; audio and sound recording and production; record production; videotape production; production of motion picture films; distribution of motion picture films; television program syndication; entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of music and music-related entertainment; entertainment, namely, a continuing music and music-related entertainment show distributed over television, satellite, audio, and video media; publication of books and magazines; entertainment in the nature of ongoing radio programs; entertainment in the nature of live music concerts and performances by musical artists and groups; entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by musical groups, musical artists and celebrities; entertainment services in the nature of live performances rendered by musical artists through the medium of television and radio; entertainment services, namely, recorded performances by musical artists rendered live and recorded for future distribution; educational and entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of television shows, sports events, fashion shows, game shows, music shows, award shows and comedy shows before live audiences which are all broadcast live or taped for later broadcast; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring non-downloadable musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, multimedia materials featuring music and music-related entertainment, and photographs; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of music, musical artists and music videos; entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of music festivals; entertainment services, namely, conducting exhibitions in the field of music and the arts; organizing exhibitions for entertainment purposes featuring music and the arts; and publishing of web magazines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 4, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |