Drawing for ENCHANTED VALLEY

USPTO serial 77769090

ENCHANTED VALLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENCHANTED VALLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori N. Boatright

LORI N. BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016books in the field of children's entertainment; magazines in the field of children's entertainment; stickers; posters; stationery; school supplies, namely, pens, pencils, paper, notebooks, sketchbooks, book covers, erasers, drawing rulers, pen and pencil holders, desk accessories, namely, desk pads, desk stands, and holders for pens, pencils and inkACTIVE—
028toys, namely, dolls, plush toys; toy action figures; toy vehicles; toy accessories, namely, action figure playsets; dollhouses; accessories for toy action figures; accessories for toy vehicle track sets; toy purses and carryalls for use with toy dolls, action figures and plush toys; hand held units for playing electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitorACTIVE—
041television programs and web programs primarily for childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 21, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 29, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 29, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 12, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 3, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance