Drawing for NEOGA LAKES

USPTO serial 77769358

NEOGA LAKES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEOGA LAKES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William Spatz

William Spatz Lucas & Mercanti, LLP475 Park Avenue South15th FloorNew York, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Real estate marketing services in the field of condominiums, apartments and homes, and real estate sales management services; providing business meeting room facilitiesACTIVE—
036Real estate brokerage and management services, and real estate planning services, namely, strategic planning and implementation related to real estate procurement and disposition for othersACTIVE—
037Real estate planning and development services for commercial, recreational and residential land uses; real estate construction, construction supervision and repair servicesACTIVE—
041Recreation services in the nature of providing horseback riding, swimming, tennis court and golf course facilities, and entertainment services in the nature of tennis and golf tournamentsACTIVE—
043resort hotel services, restaurant services, catering services, providing bar facilities and meeting room facilities for social and entertainment purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 31, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 16, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 17, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 19, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 28, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 10, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance