USPTO serial 77769733
IMENU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMENU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic advertisement and messaging display unit with multi-networking (TCP/IP) capabilities and remote connectivity; Electronic computers; Electronic LCD advertisement display unit with multi-networking (TCP/IP) capabilities; Electronic LCD display unit with multi-networking (TCP/IP) capabilities; Portable and handheld digital electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data, image, and audio files | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |