USPTO serial 77770246
NON-TYPICAL GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2011
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NON-TYPICAL GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ellicott City, MD
Ellicott City, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Royal W. Craig
Royal W. Craig Ober/Kaler, A Professional Corporation100 Light StreetBaltimore, MD 21202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | HUNTING BAGS, NAMELY, EQUIPMENT BAGS TO HOLD SUPPLIES AND PRODUCT USED WHILE HUNTING OUTDOORS, INCLUDING GAME CALLS, RIFLES, AMMUNITION AND SHELLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR HUNTING, NAMELY, JACKETS, PANTS, SHIRTS, VESTS, BOOTS, FOOTWEAR, HATS AND HAND-WARMERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2011 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |